Students should hold groups that represent them accountable PDF Print E-mail
Written by Branding Iron   
Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:16

Dear Editor,

I know this topic has been receiving a great deal of attention, but I can’t resist.  It’s not time to move on until the students of this university are properly informed regarding this issue.

While many of us know the decision made by the ASUW Judicial Council regarding the various complaints made by Brink/Unangst during the ASUW elections, we haven’t seen a single article, press release or any official notification other than Facebook statuses and text messages regarding the decision. 

If the BI is going to write an article mentioning the complaints, perhaps it’s not too much of a request to publish a follow up article? The matter has gotten a sufficient amount of press coverage over on the opinion page, so it hasn’t been completely ignored by the BI staff.  As of April 25, the main headline on the Branding Iron website is “Still no verdict on ASUW elections.” That article was posted almost ten days ago.

Also, how come we have not seen any sort of official publication from the Judicial Council? While many people disagree with its decision, the council should have published the decision and how they determined such a decision. How can students know for a fact the decision made by the judicial council was fair and unbiased? One can suspect the ASUW elections may have been carried out with a bias when one of the candidates is rumored to be in a relationship with one of the members of the ASUW Elections Committee. Are we sure this same alleged bias has not occurred with members of the Judicial Council? The less transparent and less open it is, the more students will suspect the Judicial Council has something to hide.

Read more...
 
Athletics portion of student fees worth the price PDF Print E-mail
Written by Branding Iron   
Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:11

Dear Editor,

In regard to Tuesday’s Op-Ed regarding the overpriced product of athletics; I praise the humor employed by Mr. Hesse.  Unfortunately, I disagree whole heartedly with his opinion on the issue.  Firstly, I wish to state my opinion that it is not worth the sobriety of two cases of beer to allow ASUW to play “Mr. Smith Goes to the Union to hammer out how much money the Voodoo club gets for their spring mixer.”  Beer, to me, typically seems to enhance the state of this campus more than any political official in the ranks of ASUW I’ve encountered through my four years on campus.

Regarding the specific issue of athletics however, I find the argument in question to be short-sighted and lacking acknowledgement of the full athletic achievements on our campus of the University of Wyoming.  

There is no denying the fact that the athletics department “pushes” football and men’s basketball more than any other sport, but that does not mean the student fee to athletics is solely devoted to those two sports.

Read more...
 
ASUW Elections: Let's be Freinds PDF Print E-mail
Written by Eric M Ogle   
Tuesday, 26 April 2011 08:48

It has been 2 weeks since the last president/ vice president election and I have already read a lot of reviews about Degenfelders and McNamee’s campaign. I’m not going point fingers at anybody because I also wrote a review on their campaign and how the campaign was actually run. It is good to see students saying their opinions and fighting for what they think is right.

         In Thursday’s Branding Iron paper, I read a review that basically said the campaigners on the Deg/Mac side are silenced and that people are basically “calling them out”. If we really want to see a stronger community and a stronger university, we absolutely cannot call out other people. Yes, I know that their campaign was run off of unethical ways, but we need to put our differences aside and to see what WE, as students of this university, can do to make a change that will last forever.

         The president/ vice president and ASUW only have a very small fraction of portrayal in this university. It’s us, the students, who actually give the biggest portrayal and the biggest outlook on this university. A good portion of the time we do need to go to ASUW and the president/ vice President for help. With that being said the other portion says that if we really wanted to see change, then we need to get together and start making a change. By doing this we have a stronger bond with ourselves and with one another.

         There is a famous saying from the Batman Begins movie that goes something like this, “ It’s not who you are, but what you do that defines you.” If we stand together and Unite as one, this University will go a lot of places. This I promise you.

 

Eric M Ogle

 

 

 

 

 
Deg/Mac supporters remaining silent after poor campaign platform PDF Print E-mail
Written by Branding Iron   
Wednesday, 20 April 2011 21:05


I’m writing in response to the conversation generated by Zach Spadt’s April 18th article. Spadt volleyed a criticism of ASUW as “pretend government”. Commenting on his article via the online edition of the Branding Iron, former ASUW Chief of Staff Liz Rader lobbed back a somewhat reasonable (albeit rife with errors) defense of ASUW. Rader argued that those involved in ASUW are “doing the best they can”. If we accept this as true, it begs the question: why did we elect them, and why have we seemingly chosen more of the same this time?  Rader asserted that those with complaints should “step up”, an argument that has been made since democracy was barely a gleam in its father’s eye: if you’re unhappy with your government, run for office and fix it.

 The problem with the “why don’t you run” argument in this squabble is that uh…someone did. A student with a concrete background in leadership and service (like shoes-on-the-ground action, not the masturbatory resume-fillers that we have somehow come to justify) ran for ASUW President. And lost. My problem is not with Deg/Mac or even with ASUW (because God knows, I have a real life with responsibilities that go beyond wringing my hands about the student council). No, my problem is with the student body’s apparent lack of ability to diverge from the narrow perspective and outcomes produced by the misconception that “leadership conferences” are anything other than an expensive and boring way to get drunk in a hotel room.

Not to be weird, but I think it’s preferable for ASUW to be helmed by someone with, for example, AmeriCorps experience, rather than someone who thinks ‘relatability’ is a word and can call themself down-to-earth with a straight face and a Denali parked outside. If this whole exercise/spectacle really is meant to educate students about, and prepare them for the “real” government, then instead of making up words and printing pretty posters, candidates need to propose specific, plausible policy goals that have a shot of being implemented and effective. Megan and Ty want to act like real leaders? Holding people in positions of power accountable (like Unangst/Brink proposed to do regarding UW administration’s failure to live up to their promises) is LEADERSHIP. Insisting that the University fight for students who have become victims (as in formulating solutions to mend the closure of the sexual assault center) is LEADERSHIP. Attempting to sustain a program that hundreds of University students regularly use (SafeRide!) is RELATABLE. Condescending to constituents about how you’re “…gonna work really hard to keep the student fee low for you guys” has nothing to do with either, and if Degenfelder believes she has a snowball’s chance in hell of that campaign promise coming to fruition without program cuts, she is not only the new President of ASUW, but also the Chief Executive of Fantasy Land. If the voters can’t see that, they get what they deserve.

More important than the responsibilities that lie with the candidates, the voters have an obligation to protect themselves and their dollars, by educating themselves and using that critical thinking thingy the education system seems so keen on. Buying into baseless rhetorical devices rather than conceivably workable strategies gets all of us nowhere, and as a fellow fee paying student, I have a right to be upset that 1,246 people drank the Kool-Aid.

I’m calling you out, Deg/Mac supporters. Students who voted them into office, where are you hiding? We haven’t yet heard a word from you in this circus, so I want to know: why? What in the world convinced you of their competence? How did you, aware of the problems in ASUW, and stagnant governments everywhere, watch the prosaic, vague, Eminem-soundtracked Deg/Mac campaign video and think “Ah ha! Now THIS is our solution!” Why did you think Degenfelder and McNamee’s inability to explain sustainability in relation to their goals, rousing promise to “change stuff on campus”, and willingness to fold, spindle and mutilate elections guidelines meant that they warranted your vote? Step up. Get involved. I’m all ears. 


Nora K. Gayle

UW Student

 
Vote for a Democrat in Wyoming to support state labor rights PDF Print E-mail
Written by Branding Iron   
Wednesday, 20 April 2011 21:00

Dr. Martin Luther King was assassinated 43 years ago on April 4, 1968 in Memphis. What was he doing in Memphis? He was marching with sanitation workers in support of their efforts to gain collective bargaining rights and a decent living wage. Why was he doing this? In part to reduce poverty and to help lift up the middle class, for all people. Today there is a resurgence of the same kind of demonstrations across the nation. Why? Because worker’s rights are under siege by those on the right, funded in part by powerful corporations.

Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 2